<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Conservapedia is the dumbest thing I have ever seen. Ever.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hanlonsrazor.org/2007/06/19/conservapedia-is-the-dumbest-thing-i-have-ever-seen-ever/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hanlonsrazor.org/2007/06/19/conservapedia-is-the-dumbest-thing-i-have-ever-seen-ever/</link>
	<description>Since 2006, Hanlon&#039;s Razor has offered a clear, fair, liberal analysis of today&#039;s important events.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 01:14:58 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: It's Friday and I Love Blogs &#124; Prose Before Hos</title>
		<link>http://www.hanlonsrazor.org/2007/06/19/conservapedia-is-the-dumbest-thing-i-have-ever-seen-ever/comment-page-1/#comment-696</link>
		<dc:creator>It's Friday and I Love Blogs &#124; Prose Before Hos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 20:40:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hanlonsrazor.wordpress.com/2007/06/19/conservapedia-is-the-dumbest-thing-i-have-ever-seen-ever/#comment-696</guid>
		<description>[...] Take a look through Conservapedia. For real. It&#8217;s hilarious. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Take a look through Conservapedia. For real. It&#8217;s hilarious. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nikolai</title>
		<link>http://www.hanlonsrazor.org/2007/06/19/conservapedia-is-the-dumbest-thing-i-have-ever-seen-ever/comment-page-1/#comment-702</link>
		<dc:creator>nikolai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 16:51:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hanlonsrazor.wordpress.com/2007/06/19/conservapedia-is-the-dumbest-thing-i-have-ever-seen-ever/#comment-702</guid>
		<description>David Bjornsen said:
 &quot;Who says that someone from the left wouldn’t do the same thing?&quot;
Bravo David! Some one (preferably left leaning) needs to look into starting a &quot;liberpedia!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David Bjornsen said:<br />
 &#8220;Who says that someone from the left wouldn’t do the same thing?&#8221;<br />
Bravo David! Some one (preferably left leaning) needs to look into starting a &#8220;liberpedia!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simmons</title>
		<link>http://www.hanlonsrazor.org/2007/06/19/conservapedia-is-the-dumbest-thing-i-have-ever-seen-ever/comment-page-1/#comment-701</link>
		<dc:creator>Simmons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 16:31:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hanlonsrazor.wordpress.com/2007/06/19/conservapedia-is-the-dumbest-thing-i-have-ever-seen-ever/#comment-701</guid>
		<description>The only person that even comes CLOSE to O&#039;Reilly would MAYBE be Lou Dobbs. And thats a huge MAYBE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only person that even comes CLOSE to O&#8217;Reilly would MAYBE be Lou Dobbs. And thats a huge MAYBE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.hanlonsrazor.org/2007/06/19/conservapedia-is-the-dumbest-thing-i-have-ever-seen-ever/comment-page-1/#comment-700</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 11:20:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hanlonsrazor.wordpress.com/2007/06/19/conservapedia-is-the-dumbest-thing-i-have-ever-seen-ever/#comment-700</guid>
		<description>&quot;Who says that someone from the left wouldn’t do the same thing?&quot;

Reality has a liberal bias.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Who says that someone from the left wouldn’t do the same thing?&#8221;</p>
<p>Reality has a liberal bias.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hanlon</title>
		<link>http://www.hanlonsrazor.org/2007/06/19/conservapedia-is-the-dumbest-thing-i-have-ever-seen-ever/comment-page-1/#comment-699</link>
		<dc:creator>Hanlon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 04:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hanlonsrazor.wordpress.com/2007/06/19/conservapedia-is-the-dumbest-thing-i-have-ever-seen-ever/#comment-699</guid>
		<description>David, if you can show me anything nearly on the equivalent level of FOX News and Conservapedia I&#039;d like to see it.

Heck, is there any mainstream news source that attacks conservatives even nearly as vehemently as Gibson/O&#039;Reilly/Hannity/Rush lambaste liberals? Air America doesn&#039;t count, I mean news sources like the NYT or Washington Post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David, if you can show me anything nearly on the equivalent level of FOX News and Conservapedia I&#8217;d like to see it.</p>
<p>Heck, is there any mainstream news source that attacks conservatives even nearly as vehemently as Gibson/O&#8217;Reilly/Hannity/Rush lambaste liberals? Air America doesn&#8217;t count, I mean news sources like the NYT or Washington Post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Bjornsen</title>
		<link>http://www.hanlonsrazor.org/2007/06/19/conservapedia-is-the-dumbest-thing-i-have-ever-seen-ever/comment-page-1/#comment-698</link>
		<dc:creator>David Bjornsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 22:23:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hanlonsrazor.wordpress.com/2007/06/19/conservapedia-is-the-dumbest-thing-i-have-ever-seen-ever/#comment-698</guid>
		<description>&quot;Is it just me, or does the right seem to consider facts as debatable, and then insist that their “side” needs represented?&quot;

Who says that someone from the left wouldn&#039;t do the same thing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Is it just me, or does the right seem to consider facts as debatable, and then insist that their “side” needs represented?&#8221;</p>
<p>Who says that someone from the left wouldn&#8217;t do the same thing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rechan</title>
		<link>http://www.hanlonsrazor.org/2007/06/19/conservapedia-is-the-dumbest-thing-i-have-ever-seen-ever/comment-page-1/#comment-697</link>
		<dc:creator>Rechan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 21:34:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hanlonsrazor.wordpress.com/2007/06/19/conservapedia-is-the-dumbest-thing-i-have-ever-seen-ever/#comment-697</guid>
		<description>http://www.conservapedia.com/Kangaroo

Origins

Consistent with their view that the fossil record as a whole does not support the evolutionary position[2][3], creationists state that there is a lack of transitional fossils showing an evolutionary origin of kangaroos:

    The Macropod family is alleged to have evolved from either the Phalangeridae (possums) or Burramyidae (pygmy-possums)...

    However, there are no fossils of animals which appear to be intermediate between possums and kangaroos. Wabularoo naughtoni, supposed ancestor of all the macropods, was clearly a kangaroo (it greatly resembles the potoroos which dwell in Victoria’s forests). If modern kangaroos really did come from it, all this shows is the same as we see happening today, namely that kangaroos come from kangaroos, &quot;after their kind.&quot; [4]

According to the origins theory model used by creation scientists, modern kangaroos are the descendants of the two founding members of the modern kangaroo baramin that were taken aboard Noah&#039;s Ark prior to the Great Flood. It has not yet been determined by baraminologists whether kangaroos form a holobaramin with the wallaby, tree-kangaroo, wallaroo, pademelon and quokka, or if all these species are in fact apobaraminic or polybaraminic. There is, however, no evidence of a genetic bottleneck in the kangaroo species which would be expected if all kangaroos were descended from two individuals.

After the Flood, these kangaroos bred from the Ark passengers migrated to Australia. There is debate whether this migration happened over land[5] with lower sea levels during the post-flood ice age, or before the supercontinent of Pangea broke apart[6], or if they rafted on mats of vegetation torn up by the receding flood waters.[5] The idea that God simply generated kangaroos into existence there is considered by most creation researchers to be contra-Biblical.

Other views on kangaroo origins include the belief of some Australian Aborigines that kangaroos were sung into existence by their ancestors during the &quot;Dreamtime&quot; [7] and the evolutionary view that kangaroos and the other marsupials evolved from a common marsupial ancestor which lived hundreds of millions of years ago.[8]

A majority of biologists regard evolution as the most likely explanation for the origin of species including the kangaroo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.conservapedia.com/Kangaroo" rel="nofollow">http://www.conservapedia.com/Kangaroo</a></p>
<p>Origins</p>
<p>Consistent with their view that the fossil record as a whole does not support the evolutionary position[2][3], creationists state that there is a lack of transitional fossils showing an evolutionary origin of kangaroos:</p>
<p>    The Macropod family is alleged to have evolved from either the Phalangeridae (possums) or Burramyidae (pygmy-possums)&#8230;</p>
<p>    However, there are no fossils of animals which appear to be intermediate between possums and kangaroos. Wabularoo naughtoni, supposed ancestor of all the macropods, was clearly a kangaroo (it greatly resembles the potoroos which dwell in Victoria’s forests). If modern kangaroos really did come from it, all this shows is the same as we see happening today, namely that kangaroos come from kangaroos, &#8220;after their kind.&#8221; [4]</p>
<p>According to the origins theory model used by creation scientists, modern kangaroos are the descendants of the two founding members of the modern kangaroo baramin that were taken aboard Noah&#8217;s Ark prior to the Great Flood. It has not yet been determined by baraminologists whether kangaroos form a holobaramin with the wallaby, tree-kangaroo, wallaroo, pademelon and quokka, or if all these species are in fact apobaraminic or polybaraminic. There is, however, no evidence of a genetic bottleneck in the kangaroo species which would be expected if all kangaroos were descended from two individuals.</p>
<p>After the Flood, these kangaroos bred from the Ark passengers migrated to Australia. There is debate whether this migration happened over land[5] with lower sea levels during the post-flood ice age, or before the supercontinent of Pangea broke apart[6], or if they rafted on mats of vegetation torn up by the receding flood waters.[5] The idea that God simply generated kangaroos into existence there is considered by most creation researchers to be contra-Biblical.</p>
<p>Other views on kangaroo origins include the belief of some Australian Aborigines that kangaroos were sung into existence by their ancestors during the &#8220;Dreamtime&#8221; [7] and the evolutionary view that kangaroos and the other marsupials evolved from a common marsupial ancestor which lived hundreds of millions of years ago.[8]</p>
<p>A majority of biologists regard evolution as the most likely explanation for the origin of species including the kangaroo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
