Got a hot tip?
Drop us a line!

Subscribe

Links:

Site search

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

  • ian: "He’s dead. Or vacationing in Aruba, or dead and vacationing in Aruba. Unless, of course, he has since..."
  • John Galt: "Live and act within the limit of your knowledge, and keep expanding it to the limit of your life."
  • Exaggerato: "How do we know it wasn’t really some class of a CIA-sponsored forgery?"
  • ian: "That is the best news to come out of this. That and the fact that we have at least one less convicted..."
  • Dormilona: "sorry i can’t let go of this, but i too can’t stop trying to get my head around Lieberman..."

 

March 2007
M T W T F S S
« Feb   Apr »
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  

Archives

Older Articles

Archive for March 31st, 2007

Pelosi’s trip to Syria

Every so often a story comes down the wire that I can’t really get an opinion on, and I get worried because I’m afraid I may side with the White House on it. So I ask you as my liberal moonbat brethren to help me figure out why exactly Nancy Pelosi is traveling to Syria.

Pelosi’s visit to Syria would come as the United States has severed high-level contacts with Assad’s government. The administration recalled the U.S. ambassador to Damascus after the February 2005 assassination of Rafik Hariri in Lebanon. There has been very little high- or mid-level U.S. contact with Syria since then.

White House spokesperson Dana Perino strongly criticized Pelosi’s planned visit, saying, “We think it is a really bad idea.”

Someone in bloggerland, explain this one to me. I understand that the Iraq Study Group said we should extend the olive branch to Iran and Syria, but what exactly is this trying to accomplish?