Got a hot tip?
Drop us a line!

Subscribe

Links:

Site search

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

  • Hanlon: "Understood! And you do make an excellent point. Blag’s within his authority to appoint the guy,..."
  • Dormilona: "P.S. My fury was aimed at the source article (the one on the link) NOT at your commentary, Hanlon!"
  • Dormilona: "My New Year’s Resolution: Shut up and get a life. Just something to “work towards.” *_*"
  • Dormilona: "What infuriates me is that the paragraph (”The dispute had taken on racial..."
  • Rechan: "I don’t have resolutions. I know they’re a bunch of bull. Not the desire to improve is useless,..."

 

March 2007
M T W T F S S
« Feb   Apr »
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  

Archives

Older Articles

Bush’s “somber” message on Iraq.

by Hanlon on March 19, 2007 at 7:30 pm

Sometimes I get the feeling that Bush literally does not have a connection to the world around him. I don’t mean this in any kind of partisan bitterness or that I’m simply assuming the worst. It just seems like when he speaks, he does so with absolutely no consideration for what’s going on or what he’s said before.

Take his recent speech on progress in Iraq. As you’re reading this, take into consideration what makes this speech any different from the others we’ve heard over the past few years, and add in just general thoughts of what’s happened since the Iraqi invasion. Let’s kick things off:

Four years ago today coalition forces launched Operation Iraqi Freedom to remove Saddam Hussein from power. They did so to eliminate the threat his regime posed to the Middle East and to the world.

I am willing to bet we will never hear Bush mentioning WMDs when he talks about Iraq again. It’s patently false enough that Iraq posed a significant threat to even the Middle East, let alone the world, but notice that he says the mission was the removal of Saddam Hussein. The fact that the nation was repeatedly told of weapons of mass destruction and that invasion was simply based on that has gone away. Moving on…

So with our help, Iraq’s government is carrying out an aggressive plan to secure Baghdad. And we’re continuing to train the Iraqi security forces so that they ultimately take full responsibility for the security of their own people.

Prime Minister Maliki and General Petraeus emphasized that the Baghdad security plan is still in its early stages and success will take months, not days or weeks.

These are things we should have had years ago. It seems to suggest that between May of 2003 and now there hasn’t been an aggressive plan to secure Baghdad. March of 2007 simply should not be the time when we’re hearing about a plan to secure Baghdad in its “early stages”. We’re nearing up on four years after Saddam was taken out of power, and this speech could have come in March of 2004 and sounded perfectly applicable, the progress since then is lacking, to say the least.

My heart goes out the most to our soldiers. They’re being sent into this mess with inadequate equipment, an undefined goal, and hollow words for support from Washington. Yes yes, we all support the troops and we all want them to win the war and come home safely. Unfortunately, Bush has systematically refused to do what’s necessary to at least complete his mission and as a result he’s doing nothing to ensure they’ll come home safely.

Comments

Comment from J
Time March 31, 2007 at 5:57 am

For someone who, internationally speaking, gained his placement with crooked elections, not to have a connection?
But the blame of invasion of several countries, by coercion and/or war tactics, rests solely upon republicans, a terrifying group without consideration for what’s going on. In one generation, the United States has gone from being resented for their greed and lack of ethics to villified. Like a fat kid with a little ….

Write a comment