Got a hot tip?
Drop us a line!

Subscribe

Links:

Site search

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

  • Hanlon: "Understood! And you do make an excellent point. Blag’s within his authority to appoint the guy,..."
  • Dormilona: "P.S. My fury was aimed at the source article (the one on the link) NOT at your commentary, Hanlon!"
  • Dormilona: "My New Year’s Resolution: Shut up and get a life. Just something to “work towards.” *_*"
  • Dormilona: "What infuriates me is that the paragraph (”The dispute had taken on racial..."
  • Rechan: "I don’t have resolutions. I know they’re a bunch of bull. Not the desire to improve is useless,..."

 

March 2007
M T W T F S S
« Feb   Apr »
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  

Archives

Older Articles

Surprise! Rove involved in US Attorney terminations

by Hanlon on March 15, 2007 at 5:58 pm

I think most of us saw this one coming a mile away. So the White House insisted that there was no involvement on their end about firing all 93 US attorneys, that it was all Harriet Miers’ idea. Apparently, and what a surprise it is, that’s not quite the case.

New unreleased e-mails from top administration officials show that the idea of firing all 93 U.S. attorneys was raised by White House adviser Karl Rove in early January 2005, indicating Rove was more involved in the plan than the White House previously acknowledged.

The e-mails also show that Attorney General Alberto Gonzales discussed the idea of firing the attorneys en masse weeks before he was confirmed as attorney general.

The e-mails directly contradict White House assertions that the notion originated with recently departed White House counsel Harriet Miers, and was her idea alone.

It seems like a good rule of thumb that whenever a scandal breaks out, if the White House insists that they had no involvement in it, they probably did. I’m curious what the ratio is on that one.

Write a comment