Got a hot tip?
Drop us a line!

Subscribe

Links:

Site search

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

  • Hanlon: "Understood! And you do make an excellent point. Blag’s within his authority to appoint the guy,..."
  • Dormilona: "P.S. My fury was aimed at the source article (the one on the link) NOT at your commentary, Hanlon!"
  • Dormilona: "My New Year’s Resolution: Shut up and get a life. Just something to “work towards.” *_*"
  • Dormilona: "What infuriates me is that the paragraph (”The dispute had taken on racial..."
  • Rechan: "I don’t have resolutions. I know they’re a bunch of bull. Not the desire to improve is useless,..."

 

January 2007
M T W T F S S
« Dec   Feb »
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031  

Archives

Older Articles

Military action against Iran: not ruled out

by Hanlon on January 14, 2007 at 7:33 pm

My “foreshadowing” sensors are going crazy, right along with my “bad sign” indicators. When asked whether or not we’re going to be using military force against Iran, a White House official gave a “no, but we’re not gonna rule it out”. Of course, the more disturbing bit was this:

Asked repeatedly whether the United States has the authority to enter Iran if it believes doing so would help prevent attacks, Hadley did not answer. Then came this exchange:

Host George Stephanopoulos: “So, you don’t believe you have the authority to go into Iran?”

Hadley: “I didn’t say that. This is another issue. Any time you have questions about crossing international borders, there are legal issues.”

Yep, I’d say we can safely assume an attack on Iran is imminent, and there will be a huge showdown ‘twixt the Legislative and Executive branches.

Comments

Comment from Wil Robinson
Time January 14, 2007 at 9:46 pm

Haven’t we already begun the attack on Iran with the raid on the consulate in Iraq?

Where are the Democrats and the ‘liberal’ media that supposedly learned their lesson in the lead up to Iraq?

Comment from Hanlon
Time January 15, 2007 at 12:05 am

It’s really unbelievable. When Bush’s numbers were in the crapper, I just assumed it was because he still had Congress under his thumb.

Now we’ve got a Democratic legislative branch, Bush’s numbers at STILL record lows all across the boards, and the media still won’t man up and call it square.

Write a comment