Got a hot tip?
Drop us a line!

Subscribe

Links:

Site search

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

  • Hanlon: "Understood! And you do make an excellent point. Blag’s within his authority to appoint the guy,..."
  • Dormilona: "P.S. My fury was aimed at the source article (the one on the link) NOT at your commentary, Hanlon!"
  • Dormilona: "My New Year’s Resolution: Shut up and get a life. Just something to “work towards.” *_*"
  • Dormilona: "What infuriates me is that the paragraph (”The dispute had taken on racial..."
  • Rechan: "I don’t have resolutions. I know they’re a bunch of bull. Not the desire to improve is useless,..."

 

January 2007
M T W T F S S
« Dec   Feb »
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031  

Archives

Older Articles

Pentagon official criticized for “intimidating” Gitmo lawyers

by Hanlon on January 13, 2007 at 6:42 pm

Hey, more good news. I hadn’t heard about this, but apparently a Pentagon official had suggested that companies boycott law firms representing detainees at Guantanamo Bay. Needless to say, the Pentagon itself wasn’t on board with him.

Charles “Cully” Stimson, the deputy assistant secretary of defense for detainee affairs, said in a radio interview last week that companies might want to consider taking their business to firms that do not represent suspected terrorists.

A Pentagon spokesman, Lt. Col. Brian Maka, said Stimson was not speaking for the Bush administration.

Stimson’s comments “do not represent the views of the Department of Defense or the thinking of its leadership,” Maka told The Associated Press on Saturday.

At least the Pentagon as a whole is getting their heads on straight. Cully? You’re a friggin’ moron. Just thought you’d like to know. I don’t think I need to actually explain why, but I’ll do it anyway.

“And I think, quite honestly, when corporate CEOs see that those firms are representing the very terrorists who hit their bottom line back in 2001, those CEOs are going to make those law firms choose between representing terrorists or representing reputable firms,” Stimson said.

Actually, wait. Do I need to explain why he’s a friggin’ moron? No. No, I don’t.

Comments

Comment from George
Time January 14, 2007 at 9:44 am

At least the Pentagon was smart enough to distance themselves from this guys comments. He should be smart enough to keep his yapper shut and not make stupid comments like that since he is a part of the Pentagon.

Comment from Hanlon
Time January 15, 2007 at 12:07 am

I’m actually surprised, that’s the thing. I figured they’d have no comment at best, or make some kind of “non-denial” response that sounded like an admonishment but actually agreed.

Write a comment