Got a hot tip?
Drop us a line!

Subscribe

Links:

Site search

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

  • Hanlon: "Understood! And you do make an excellent point. Blag’s within his authority to appoint the guy,..."
  • Dormilona: "P.S. My fury was aimed at the source article (the one on the link) NOT at your commentary, Hanlon!"
  • Dormilona: "My New Year’s Resolution: Shut up and get a life. Just something to “work towards.” *_*"
  • Dormilona: "What infuriates me is that the paragraph (”The dispute had taken on racial..."
  • Rechan: "I don’t have resolutions. I know they’re a bunch of bull. Not the desire to improve is useless,..."

 

December 2006
M T W T F S S
« Nov   Jan »
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Archives

Older Articles

Bush: We’re not winning in Iraq.

by Hanlon on December 20, 2006 at 11:20 pm

Hm. Interesting. Bush has at least conceded we aren’t winning in Iraq, though his subsequent sentiments are… less than encouraging.

In another turnaround, Bush said he has ordered Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates to develop a plan to increase the troop strength of the Army and Marine Corps, heeding warnings from the Pentagon and Capitol Hill that multiple deployments in Iraq and Afghanistan are stretching the armed forces toward the breaking point.

“We need to reset our military,” said Bush.

Now, I want you all to sit and think that over for a little while, because this is something I was actually unaware of until now. Bush hasn’t just been refusing withdrawal, he’s also been refusing increases of troops (hence the “turnaround”). Could he make it any more obvious this is a war of pride? Our president won’t even concede he didn’t use enough troops until he’s forced to. More…

In describing his decision, Bush tied it to the broader struggle against Islamic extremists around the world rather than to Iraq specifically. “It is an accurate reflection that this ideological war we’re in is going to last for a while and that we’re going to need a military that’s capable of being able to sustain our efforts and to help us achieve peace,” he said.

Ah. So we’re not winning now, but the war is still going to be incredibly long so everyone better buckle up and get ready for us to lose a lot more. Not to mention he’s still stuck telling us about the “ideological war”. Gah.

Comments

Comment from Michele
Time December 21, 2006 at 1:45 am

the majority of military and foriegn policy experts , which bush ,gates,cheney and rummy were not ,agree there is no victory to be had in Iraq.

we either leave now with bad results or leave later with worse.

it isn’t just pride on bushs’ half but ignorance.

Comment from Hanlon
Time December 21, 2006 at 2:14 am

One of the most frankly frightening thoughts concerning Iraq is just that. Sure if we leave now there’ll be a disaster, but is there any assurance that there won’t be one if we leave 5, 10, 20 years from now?

Comment from JollyRoger
Time December 24, 2006 at 1:58 am

El Shrubbo del Estupido is clearly parroting whatever he’s been told to parrot.

I don’t think there could be better proof of that than his utter inability to speak to any issue with anything resembling consistency. I’m not sure he knows when he lies and when he tells the truth, because his remarks are clearly pre-selected for him.

Write a comment