Rumsfeld personally authorized torture

Amazing. Another military official steps forward on Iraq War corruption, this time alleging that Rumsfeld authorized the use of “harsh interrogation methods” in writing.

[Former U.S. Army Brigadier General Janis] Karpinski, who ran the prison until early 2004, said she saw a memorandum signed by Rumsfeld detailing the use of harsh interrogation methods.

“The handwritten signature was above his printed name and in the same handwriting in the margin was written: “Make sure this is accomplished”,” she told Saturday’s El Pais.

Rumsfeld also authorized the army to break the Geneva Conventions by not registering all prisoners, Karpinski said, explaining how she raised the case of one unregistered inmate with an aide to former U.S. commander Lt. Gen. Ricardo Sanchez.

“We received a message from the Pentagon, from the Defense Secretary, ordering us to hold the prisoner without registering him. I now know this happened on various occasions.”

To quote my buddy Will: like Kissinger, he’d be up for war crimes if he ever set foot outside the United States.

Rumsfeld’s “resignation” was intended to show the public that Bush is recognizing faults and trying to fix things. Since Rummy was the face of Iraq War incompetence, dropping him means we’re moving toward progress.

Problem: it also exhibits Bush’s lovely tendency to think that he can throw us a bone and then the mistakes of the past are all forgotten. I refuse to accept that. Just because Rumsfeld is gone doesn’t mean we can ignore what happened under his watch. Every innocent person illegally tortured, and even the guilty ones who were illegally tortured, deserve that much.

Bush’s Biggest Headache

Interesting. The elephant in the room of the Democratic Congress has been what to do about Bush. No one wants to pull a Clinton-era and just start launching investigations that don’t yield anything, and I can’t imagine the redcoat machine accepting the kind of poison they spat at Willie.

But we’ve got a guy who wants to tackle the issue head on: Rep Henry Waxman.

When he became top Democrat of the Government Reform Committee in 1997, Waxman realized that he didn’t have to settle for playing defense like most in the House minority. He took advantage of the committee’s large staff to hire talented investigators to pursue projects large and small.

His targets have ranged from why the Taekwondo Union was allowing 12- and 13-year-olds to kick opponents in the head, to Medicare drug costs and baseball steroid use, to abuse of Iraqi prisoners at Abu Ghraib and government contracts given to Vice President Dick Cheney’s former company, Halliburton.

After agitating by Waxman, the State Department had to revise a report claiming terrorism had decreased in 2003, to reflect that it actually had increased.

Seems like my kinda guy. Logical and going after the right targets. Most importantly?

After agitating by Waxman, the State Department had to revise a report claiming terrorism had decreased in 2003, to reflect that it actually had increased.

Excellent. One of the big separations between the way the right treated Clinton and the way the left is looking at Bush is that in the 90s, Clinton was investigated for random things because many of the Republicans in power simply hated the guy. The Vince Foster business, Whitewater, etc, they came about simply to take Clinton down.

The left doesn’t have that. After 9/11 we all wanted to give him a chance. Even Al Franken went along with Bush despite not being enamoured with him. But Bush betrayed our trust, he took advantage of our good will, and so far no one has cared enough to make him take responsibility for what he’s done. Hopefully this will change soon.

What's new?

Got a hot tip?
Drop us a line!

Donate to the Razor

Subscribe