Got a hot tip?
Drop us a line!

Subscribe

Links:

Site search

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

  • Dormilona: "He’s back. But there’s no emotion. None. Just the pretense of it. The words, the gesture,..."
  • ian: "He’s dead. Or vacationing in Aruba, or dead and vacationing in Aruba. Unless, of course, he has since..."
  • John Galt: "Live and act within the limit of your knowledge, and keep expanding it to the limit of your life."
  • Exaggerato: "How do we know it wasn’t really some class of a CIA-sponsored forgery?"
  • ian: "That is the best news to come out of this. That and the fact that we have at least one less convicted..."

 

November 2006
M T W T F S S
« Oct   Dec »
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930  

Archives

Older Articles

Back in Iraq…

by Hanlon on November 9, 2006 at 8:03 pm

First official word on the casualties in Iraq that I’ve seen. We’ve had a lot of estimates but finally the government is giving us a number and it’s not good.

Nearly simultaneous car bombs struck two markets in predominantly Shiite areas of Baghdad on Thursday, killing at least 16 people. Iraq’s health minister said about 150,000 have been killed by insurgents since the war started, giving the government’s first overall casualty estimate.

Emphasis mine. Now this is important for one big reason: that’s just from the insurgents. It’s ignoring, for example, how many civilians died at the hands of American soldiers. I would say the total deaths would be considerably over 200,000 if not creeping up toward 300,000.

Cross your fingers, this might get a new direction finally.

Write a comment