Is America really the world’s most advanced nation?

We hear it all the time. The terrorists hate America because we’re the best country in the world. They hate our freedom, they hate us because we’re just that friggin’ awesome. That’s why they come after us so much. Policy, our actions elsewhere in the world, no. Terrorists simply hate America for being Number 1.

So that got me thinking, are we really?

Now I love this place. I speak the language, I know a couple of the people, I live here. America’s great, and it’s my home. But I’ve got my questions about it’s Numero Uno status. Take a look, for example, at our continuing resistance to evolution being treated as fact. I knew the ol’ US of A was hesitant to accept evolution, but our status in the world is a little pathetic.

A survey of 32 European countries, the US and Japan has revealed that only Turkey is less willing than the US to accept evolution as fact.

31st out of 32 in willingness to accept evolution. That’s absolutely pathetic. Why has it been this way? Simply put, the religious right. Because evolution is called “the theory of evolution”, then they use the colloquial definition of theory that makes it sound like it has no basis in reality and is just something someone thought up. Thus, it’s not “fact” and is considered on par with creationism or its incestuous child Intelligent Design.

There was an episode of Penn and Teller’s Bullshit that showed a few Creationists, types I’ve met myself over the years. One of them stated: “Because evolution is not proven, it should be taught alongside creationism.” Because the evolutionary theory is, really, incapable of being called law without the use of a time machine, that means completely baseless concepts should be taught as equally valid?

People can be religious all they want, but to try and base science or law around it is just ludicrous. I’d like to see someone legislate based on a story out of Greek mythology, or a president say he goes to war because Jupiter came to him in a dream.

Moving along, let’s take a look at general intelligence. John Stossel wrote “stupid in school” which is a good primer for the hows and whys of why we’re slipping.

The longer kids stay in American schools, the worse they do in international competition. They do worse than kids from poorer countries that spend much less money on education, ranking behind not only Belgium but also Poland, the Czech Republic and South Korea.

Wasted money, the inability to fire teachers, the fact that the public school you live near is your only choice all contribute to this. But I’m not a fan of these kinds of things, so let’s take a look at hard data, coming from the TIMSS for math and the PIRLS for literacy. First the TIMSS, which is a PDF so I can’t directly quote.

The result you’ll find is that in 4th grade the US ranks 8th in mathematical ability. Nothing to be ashamed of. 8th grade? Down to 14th. It seems to bolster Stossel’s claim that the longer we stay in school, the dumber we get.

Over to the PIRLS, which offers a popup window ranking for your viewing pleasure. Over there with 2001 numbers on 4th graders we find that the US averages 8th place for literacy and information. No matter which study you look at: we’re doing well but we’re not the most advanced.

I don’t even think I need to bring up that we’re the most out of shape country in the world. Though I’ve heard Australia recently surpassed us.

How about general stuff? The UN Human Development Index is an interesting way to look up that little guy. It’s a number that pulls from a large number of sources (literacy, poverty, life expectancey, etc). Maybe the US isn’t the best at any one thing, surely we’re the best over all, right? Take a look.

  1. Norway (=)
  2. Iceland (↑ 5)
  3. Australia (=)
  4. Luxembourg (↑ 11)
  5. Canada (↑ 1)
  6. Sweden (↓ 4)
  7. Switzerland (↑ 4)
  8. Ireland (↑ 2)
  9. Belgium (↓ 3)
  10. United States (↓ 2)

We’re roundin’ out the top 10 and actually dropped a few spots. Norway’s topping and even Iceland who hopped up five spots was ahead last time (7th to 8th). You can take a look at any of the factors lower down. 48th in life expectancy, middle of the road on AIDS/HIV prevalence. We’ve got 12% of the population living under the poverty line which is fairly bad when you consider that the poverty line is under $10,000 a year for one person, barely over $13,000 for a two-person household. Then realize that if you make minimum wage, you won’t even earn the poverty threshold. 33rd in unemployment.

How sad is that? If you live in America and earn minimum wage, you won’t make enough to even match the poverty threshold. And yet the republicans refuse to raise it. Wouldn’t you think that the bare minimum pay should, logically, get you to just not be in poverty?

But we are, undeniably, the world’s foremost superpower. Why’s that? We’re not the smartest, we don’t live the longest, make the most money, our citizens aren’t living the best lives. What is it? We’ve got the most powerful military. To quote Dennis Leary, we have the bombs.

And that’s kinda scary. We can annihilate any nation we want, we’re working hard to do all we can to beef up the military so we can fight the terrists, but efforts to actually improve the lives of the citizens seems to fall by the wayside. We SHOULD be number one, dammit. I don’t like living in the national equivalent of Moe from Calvin and Hobbes.

All of this brings me to my conclusion, if I can wrap this all up and throw in a take-home message. The republicans don’t care about our schools. They don’t care about the quality of our citizen’s lives. They care about authoritarian control and turning the USA into a military state. While money gets poured into the Iraq War, it’s pulled from giving money to college students and the No Child Left Behind crap ends up making students dumber by depriving them of education in other subjects.

Unsurprisingly, the US ranks 1st or second across the board for military expenditure, number of nukes, and number of troops.

So this November, think about what you want America to be. I’d like to be able to say we do have the best and brightest, but it doesn’t look like we do. We’re supposed to be on top of the world due to the quality of our country, not because we’re the most intimidating. It seems like the redcoats prefer the latter. I like the former.

[tags]united states, america, republicans, democrats, education, life expectancy, united nations[/tags]

We hear it all the time. The terrorists hate America because we’re the best country in the world. They hate our freedom, they hate us because we’re just that friggin’ awesome. That’s why they come after us so much. Policy, our actions elsewhere in the world, no. Terrorists simply hate America for being Number 1.

So that got me thinking, are we really?

Now I love this place. I speak the language, I know a couple of the people, I live here. America’s great, and it’s my home. But I’ve got my questions about it’s Numero Uno status. Take a look, for example, at our continuing resistance to evolution being treated as fact. I knew the ol’ US of A was hesitant to accept evolution, but our status in the world is a little pathetic.

A survey of 32 European countries, the US and Japan has revealed that only Turkey is less willing than the US to accept evolution as fact.

31st out of 32 in willingness to accept evolution. That’s absolutely pathetic. Why has it been this way? Simply put, the religious right. Because evolution is called “the theory of evolution”, then they use the colloquial definition of theory that makes it sound like it has no basis in reality and is just something someone thought up. Thus, it’s not “fact” and is considered on par with creationism or its incestuous child Intelligent Design.

There was an episode of Penn and Teller’s Bullshit that showed a few Creationists, types I’ve met myself over the years. One of them stated: “Because evolution is not proven, it should be taught alongside creationism.” Because the evolutionary theory is, really, incapable of being called law without the use of a time machine, that means completely baseless concepts should be taught as equally valid?

People can be religious all they want, but to try and base science or law around it is just ludicrous. I’d like to see someone legislate based on a story out of Greek mythology, or a president say he goes to war because Jupiter came to him in a dream.

Moving along, let’s take a look at general intelligence. John Stossel wrote “stupid in school” which is a good primer for the hows and whys of why we’re slipping.

The longer kids stay in American schools, the worse they do in international competition. They do worse than kids from poorer countries that spend much less money on education, ranking behind not only Belgium but also Poland, the Czech Republic and South Korea.

Wasted money, the inability to fire teachers, the fact that the public school you live near is your only choice all contribute to this. But I’m not a fan of these kinds of things, so let’s take a look at hard data, coming from the TIMSS for math and the PIRLS for literacy. First the TIMSS, which is a PDF so I can’t directly quote.

The result you’ll find is that in 4th grade the US ranks 8th in mathematical ability. Nothing to be ashamed of. 8th grade? Down to 14th. It seems to bolster Stossel’s claim that the longer we stay in school, the dumber we get.

Over to the PIRLS, which offers a popup window ranking for your viewing pleasure. Over there with 2001 numbers on 4th graders we find that the US averages 8th place for literacy and information. No matter which study you look at: we’re doing well but we’re not the most advanced.

I don’t even think I need to bring up that we’re the most out of shape country in the world. Though I’ve heard Australia recently surpassed us.

How about general stuff? The UN Human Development Index is an interesting way to look up that little guy. It’s a number that pulls from a large number of sources (literacy, poverty, life expectancey, etc). Maybe the US isn’t the best at any one thing, surely we’re the best over all, right? Take a look.

  1. Norway (=)
  2. Iceland (↑ 5)
  3. Australia (=)
  4. Luxembourg (↑ 11)
  5. Canada (↑ 1)
  6. Sweden (↓ 4)
  7. Switzerland (↑ 4)
  8. Ireland (↑ 2)
  9. Belgium (↓ 3)
  10. United States (↓ 2)

We’re roundin’ out the top 10 and actually dropped a few spots. Norway’s topping and even Iceland who hopped up five spots was ahead last time (7th to 8th). You can take a look at any of the factors lower down. 48th in life expectancy, middle of the road on AIDS/HIV prevalence. We’ve got 12% of the population living under the poverty line which is fairly bad when you consider that the poverty line is under $10,000 a year for one person, barely over $13,000 for a two-person household. Then realize that if you make minimum wage, you won’t even earn the poverty threshold. 33rd in unemployment.

How sad is that? If you live in America and earn minimum wage, you won’t make enough to even match the poverty threshold. And yet the republicans refuse to raise it. Wouldn’t you think that the bare minimum pay should, logically, get you to just not be in poverty?

But we are, undeniably, the world’s foremost superpower. Why’s that? We’re not the smartest, we don’t live the longest, make the most money, our citizens aren’t living the best lives. What is it? We’ve got the most powerful military. To quote Dennis Leary, we have the bombs.

And that’s kinda scary. We can annihilate any nation we want, we’re working hard to do all we can to beef up the military so we can fight the terrists, but efforts to actually improve the lives of the citizens seems to fall by the wayside. We SHOULD be number one, dammit. I don’t like living in the national equivalent of Moe from Calvin and Hobbes.

All of this brings me to my conclusion, if I can wrap this all up and throw in a take-home message. The republicans don’t care about our schools. They don’t care about the quality of our citizen’s lives. They care about authoritarian control and turning the USA into a military state. While money gets poured into the Iraq War, it’s pulled from giving money to college students and the No Child Left Behind crap ends up making students dumber by depriving them of education in other subjects.

Unsurprisingly, the US ranks 1st or second across the board for military expenditure, number of nukes, and number of troops.

So this November, think about what you want America to be. I’d like to be able to say we do have the best and brightest, but it doesn’t look like we do. We’re supposed to be on top of the world due to the quality of our country, not because we’re the most intimidating. It seems like the redcoats prefer the latter. I like the former.

[tags]united states, america, republicans, democrats, education, life expectancy, united nations[/tags]

Israel raids a Hezbollah stronghold

Okay, that Hezbollah wouldn’t disarm or move away from the Israeli border bothered me. But Israeli forces raiding a Hezbollah stronhold inside Lebanon? Do they want this ceasefire or not?

Witnesses said Israeli missiles also destroyed a bridge during the raid in what would be the first such airstrike since the cease-fire took effect Monday, ending 34 days of warfare between the two sides.

Israel says they were stopping weapons from getting to Hezbollah from Iran and Syria. I’m sorry, but I’m a hair away from saying “tough”. The United States funds all sorts of armies in the Middle East, Israel included, so stopping Hezbollah from getting foreign help? Come on now. And guess what? After Hezbollah started handing money to victims of Israeli airstrikes, this isn’t going to help Israel’s image in the eyes of the Lebanese.

If this cease-fire fails, I’m going to point to this as the cause.

[tags]israel, lebanon, hezbollah, cease fire, war[/tags]

So there’s that response!

I’ve been wondering when an official response from Bush would come after the NSA court decision. Well here it is, courtesy AMERICAblog.

Just saw Bush do a statement about the economy at Camp David. He took a few questions — none of which were about the economy. When asked about yesterday’s court decision about the NSA spying, he got particularly snippy:

I would say that those who, um, um, herald this decision simply do not understand the nature of the world in which we live.

Then he launched in to his terror, terror, terror screed.

He then brought up the British terror plot (ignoring that wiretapping yielded nothing in this case, the arrest was made based on the testimony of the tortured man in Pakistan). Now think about that one for a minute. Basically what Bush is saying is that the court’s decision, which is based on the law, is bad because it doesn’t understand the “nature” of the world.

And that’s a pretty scary thing. I mean, we already knew that Bush wasn’t a fan of the law. His signing statements get him around all the laws he can, and the SCOTUS’s decision on his military tribunals resulted in his attempt to get a bill put through that would MAKE what he was doing legal (nice perk of being president: if you’re breaking the law, change it!).

Now this means Bush values “the nature of the world we live in” over the rule of the law that we have. To this guy, what the law SAYS doesn’t matter. What matters is what HE thinks the law SHOULD say.

What we’re seeing is a peek into the mind of the 43rd president, a rather clear one. This is a man who believes that the president is not there to enforce the laws, but rather to DECIDE the laws. He thinks that he is the ultimate artibor of law. He thinks he should get to get to be judge, jury, and executioner.

So really, when Bush says THIS:

“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”

What he means is THIS:

“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will recklessly execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability dodge every law that disagrees with me so I can do whatever I like.”

I’m being nice here, biting my tongue and not swearing as much as I’d like. I’d just like to consider this difference between our first and our latest president.

George Washington: Rejected the notion that he should be King of the United States, believing it would be harmful for the country to have a single ruler.

George W Bush: “If this were a dictatorship, it would be a heck of a lot easier – just so long I’m the dictator.

[tags]nsa, spying, bush[/tags]

I’ve been wondering when an official response from Bush would come after the NSA court decision. Well here it is, courtesy AMERICAblog.

Just saw Bush do a statement about the economy at Camp David. He took a few questions — none of which were about the economy. When asked about yesterday’s court decision about the NSA spying, he got particularly snippy:

I would say that those who, um, um, herald this decision simply do not understand the nature of the world in which we live.

Then he launched in to his terror, terror, terror screed.

He then brought up the British terror plot (ignoring that wiretapping yielded nothing in this case, the arrest was made based on the testimony of the tortured man in Pakistan). Now think about that one for a minute. Basically what Bush is saying is that the court’s decision, which is based on the law, is bad because it doesn’t understand the “nature” of the world.

And that’s a pretty scary thing. I mean, we already knew that Bush wasn’t a fan of the law. His signing statements get him around all the laws he can, and the SCOTUS’s decision on his military tribunals resulted in his attempt to get a bill put through that would MAKE what he was doing legal (nice perk of being president: if you’re breaking the law, change it!).

Now this means Bush values “the nature of the world we live in” over the rule of the law that we have. To this guy, what the law SAYS doesn’t matter. What matters is what HE thinks the law SHOULD say.

What we’re seeing is a peek into the mind of the 43rd president, a rather clear one. This is a man who believes that the president is not there to enforce the laws, but rather to DECIDE the laws. He thinks that he is the ultimate artibor of law. He thinks he should get to get to be judge, jury, and executioner.

So really, when Bush says THIS:

“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”

What he means is THIS:

“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will recklessly execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability dodge every law that disagrees with me so I can do whatever I like.”

I’m being nice here, biting my tongue and not swearing as much as I’d like. I’d just like to consider this difference between our first and our latest president.

George Washington: Rejected the notion that he should be King of the United States, believing it would be harmful for the country to have a single ruler.

George W Bush: “If this were a dictatorship, it would be a heck of a lot easier – just so long I’m the dictator.

[tags]nsa, spying, bush[/tags]

What's new?

Got a hot tip?
Drop us a line!

Donate to the Razor

Subscribe